The City Space

Cultivating Urban Understanding


I Will Build This

100715_Uitvinders_Zeehelden 130

After four years working in the field of homelessness prevention, I’ve zeroed in on one big way to help end homelessness. It isn’t education and it isn’t a shelter. (I’ve written before about why shelters are not the solution.) It’s something more attainable and concrete.

I have many dreams (to create an Oscar-winning documentary, to become a bluegrass singer, for example) but the one I am focusing all my efforts towards and shaping my goals around is this: to build high-quality, truly affordable housing as a lasting solution to homelessness.

The “Solutions” That Don’t Work

Why is affordable housing an important solution to homelessness? In short, because welfare is unsustainable and inadequate, and because the minimum wage will take too long to go up. These “solutions” to homelessness don’t work. Let me explain. When I encounter a homeless family that has been referred to the rapid rehousing program at my organization, one of the first things I look at is their income. I will use that to figure out what sort of payments they can make towards rent now, and what sort of apartment they might be able to afford after our subsidy ends. Most clients are either getting by on welfare checks, Social Security Income (because of a serious mental or physical disability that prevents them from working), child support (with payments ranging from $2-$50 a month, i.e. negligible) or wages from a job. Everyone is also receiving SNAP benefits (i.e. food stamps).

So, let’s discuss these potential income streams for accessing housing. Continue reading

Leave a comment

4 Truths You Need to Know About Homelessness Now


Nearly every city in America is faced with an entrenched problem of homelessness. Whether you see homeless people on your streets or on our televisions, their plight exists at an appalling rate. And yet, our country has also made strides in addressing this issue. Here are 4 truths you should know about homelessness right now, gleaned from my own experiences working in the field, as well as relevant research.

1.  Homelessness affects people in all demographics. The stereotypical picture of a homeless person is an old, scruffy-looking, alcoholic man begging for change by the side of the road. This is simply not the whole picture. The U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) most recent Point in Time Count estimates that across the nation, 1/4 of all homeless people are under the age of 18, and 10% are between the ages of 18-24. In addition, families make up nearly 40% of all homeless people in the United States. People of any race, gender, sexual orientation, religion and age can and have been homeless in our country.

2.  Homelessness impacts every aspect of a person’s life. Homelessness is not just a problem because it means that individuals and families are without a place to go at night. It is also a problem because it prevents people from thriving in numerous areas of their lives: professional, mental, relational, people. When you’re homeless, your ability to apply for and find jobs is severely diminished because you lack access to showers, reliable transportation, nice clothing, a computer (unless you go to the library)–all these building blocks that are important to making a good impression on a potential employer. That’s an automatic setback as a homeless person tries to gain economic stability.

Homeless people also suffer mental health issues at a higher rate than the rest of the population. According to the National Institute of Mental Health, approximately 20-25% of homeless people have at least one mental health problem, as compared with 7% of the general population. Mental health issues can be both a cause and an effect of homelessness. These can also lead to relational conflicts with family members and friends.  In addition, homeless people often encounter relational conflicts due to their need to rely on family members for support in tough situations. On the flip side, homelessness can also result in transience–meaning that close friends and family may be cut off from the homeless individual. And tragically, many homeless men, women and children are fleeing domestic violence. These are all ways in which homelessness accompanies family break up and relational conflict. Finally, homelessness affects the physical wellbeing of a person making it challenging to find doctors and access medical services, while also taking a physical toll on a person’s body due to the need to wander and even sleep outside. Overall, it’s clear that homelessness does not just mean “without a home,” but rather, it brings with it a slew of other concerns.

3.  Homelessness is getting better in some places, but worse in others. The next truth you should know about homelessness is that there is hope. New Orleans recently announced its accomplishment of one of the nation’s major homelessness goals: ending veteran homelessness by 2015. They are part of a large pool of cities and states who have made enormous strides in the direction of this goal.  Some other recent successes include an overall decrease in homelessness nationally from 2012 to 2013 (the most recent data available). Family homelessness is down 7% and 31 states saw a decrease in homelessness. However, 20 states saw an increase. Emergency shelters across the nation have consistently been at almost 100% capacity from 2007 to 2013.  I urge you to read up on your own state to see where it fits into this picture, and what policies it has implemented to help end homelessness.

4.  Different solutions work for different people. I wrote last year about how shelters are not a long-term solution to homelessness, yet they are often used as such, with individuals and families bouncing from shelter to shelter for months. Indeed, emergency shelters are really only suited for people who have exhausted all other options and need a temporary place to stay while they figure out their next move. Many individuals who are homeless, particularly those who are chronically homeless (meaning they have been without a home for 1 year or more, or have had several episodes of homelessness) need affordable housing more than they need emergency shelter. They need a permanent solution to a persistent problem. For individuals like this with addiction issues, disabilities or mental health programs, permanent supportive housing is the best option. Supportive housing usually entails affordable apartment-style living with counselors, doctors, and/or case managers readily available to help people work through their challenges.

On the other hand, for a homeless family who is merely low-income and doesn’t have as many health issues, independent affordable housing is the best solution to homelessness. This housing can be provided by a public housing authority, a local nonprofit or for-profit company committed to providing affordable units, or through vouchers that subsidize living in normal market-rate apartments. Affordable housing can also be accessed through rapid rehousing programs like the one I work with, which gives homeless families a rental subsidy and case management for up to a year. Rapid rehousing is a temporary solution to homelessness, and rapid rehousing programs aim to have their clients paying for their own housing within a period of months or years. I detailed some other affordable housing options in this post on Strong Towns.


The best way to learn about homeless people is by speaking with them, working or volunteering with agencies that support them, and reading relevant research from organizations like the National Alliance to End Homelessness and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. I urge you to explore the stakeholders in your community who are working to end homelessness and familiarize yourself with their tactics to understand what works and what doesn’t. Finally, you can also check out previous posts I’ve written on the topic here.

Photo cred


Rapid Rehousing Reexamined: The New York City Data

I recently came across some surprising results from New York City’s implementation of the nationally championed “Rapid Re-housing model” for addressing homelessness, so I wanted to look at how we might respond when a model doesn’t work as it was intended. In my first post on Wednesday, I provided background and an overview on the Rapid Re-housing model. Today I’ll assess the New York City results and consider potential next steps.

The New York City Results

Last month, Ralph Nunez, President and CEO of the Institute for Children, Poverty and Homelessness (ICPH) published a concise report entitled “Rapidly Rehousing Homeless Families: New York City—a Case Study.” In the report, Nunez analyzes the New York City government’s implementation of Rapid Re-housing strategy in its homelessness services over the last eight years. He concludes that Rapid Re-housing has actually pushed more New York families into homelessness and increased the costs of government services for the homeless overall.

Nunez writes: “Although designed to reduce family homelessness, rapid-rehousing policies have actually had the opposite effect in New York City. By offering rental subsidies to sheltered families, government actually stimulated homelessness. Numerous families that were living doubled-up or in substandard housing saw an opportunity to secure new housing and entered the shelter system to get places in line.” In essence, Nunez contends that the offer of increased rental subsidies through the new Rapid Re-housing program encouraged families to leave their current precarious housing situations and “get in line” at the shelter.


Continue reading


Rapid Re-housing Reexamined: Background

I recently came across some surprising results from New York City’s implementation of the nationally-championed “Rapid Re-housing model” for addressing homelessness, so I wanted to look at how we might respond when a model doesn’t work as it was intended. In this two-part series, I’ll first outline the Rapid Re-housing model, then dive into the New York City results and consider next steps. If you’re already familiar with the Rapid Re-housing model you can feel free to skip this first post and check back in a couple days for an assessment of the New York City results.


This past semester I’ve been interning at the Walla Walla County Department of Health and Human Services where I focused on developing strategies to align Walla Walla’s many homelessness services with the “Rapid Re-housing model.” We’re still in the preliminary phase of applying the model to Walla Walla, but we’re collaborating with local service providers to figure out which aspects we’re already utilizing and which areas we could improve in. For my readers who may be unfamiliar with the Rapid Re-housing model I’ll give an overview in the clearest terms that I can.


Rapid Re-housing is based on an overall concept called “Housing First” which asserts that instead of trying to deal with every issue keeping a person in poverty, organizations that serve the homeless should focus primarily on getting that person permanently housed. Once a person has the stability of a home, his other issues can be more easily addressed. For instance, someone who is unemployed and homeless will have a much easier time in the job search if he has a permanent address to list on his resume, a place to shower before a job interview, and so on. The Rapid Re-housing model has been in existence for the past decade, but it came to the forefront when the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) offered grant money for Rapid Re-housing back in 2009 as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) early on in the recession. Rapid Re-housing is generally coupled with another strategy called “Targeted Prevention,” but for the purposes of this series I’ll be focusing on the Rapid Re-housing segment.

Continue reading